Oban rapist Malcolm Sloss struck off farriers register

In reaching its decision, the committee confirmed that the criminal conviction was sufficient evidence to prove the allegations. It also noted that only in exceptional circumstances could it go behind a court verdict, which it found did not exist in this case.

On the question of professional misconduct, the panel ruled that Sloss’s actions constituted serious misconduct in a professional respect. It said farriers are expected to uphold high standards of conduct both inside and outside their work, and that serious criminal behaviour—particularly sexual offences—would normally be incompatible with remaining in the profession.

The committee identified multiple aggravating factors, including the nature and severity of the offences, the number of victims, the prolonged period over which the crimes were committed, abuse of trust, and the fact that at least one victim had encountered Sloss through his professional role. It also noted a lack of insight and continuing denial of guilt.

No mitigating factors were identified beyond the absence of previous disciplinary history.

The committee considered that Sloss’ conviction was so serious that no other sanction would suffice than removal from the Register, adding that his behaviour was "fundamentally incompatible" with being a registered farrier.